Guide: Inzwa VEVA III Industry-first 3-in-1 Monitoring vs Traditional Solutions (2025)

Why This Guide Matters in 2025

The landscape of project monitoring has transformed significantly, driven by innovations in sensor technology and integrated solutions. As projects become more complex and compliance requirements more stringent in certain industries and applications, choosing the right monitoring solution is crucial for success. 

In today’s rapidly evolving industry landscape, efficient monitoring solutions have become crucial for project success. Whether you’re managing a construction site, overseeing civil engineering projects, designing architectural masterpieces in urban areas, or operating mining facilities in rural lands, accurate monitoring data is essential for safety, compliance, and operational efficiency. 

This comprehensive guide compares leading monitoring devices to help you make an informed decision based on your specific industry needs.

The Evolution of Monitoring Technology

Historically, project owners have had to rely on specialized equipment and sensors for different measurements. In fact, traditional monitoring approaches have typically required multiple devices to capture different parameters, often times leading to complex setup processes and data management challenges, including:

• Increased equipment costs
• Complex setup and maintenance procedures
• Multiple data management systems
• Higher training requirements
• Greater potential for system failures
• Increased maintenance requirements
• Higher total cost of ownership (TOC)

Multiple devices mean more installation time, mounting costs, and complex data management systems for line of sight into configuring different measurements and parameters. Additionally, maintaining and calibrating several devices can be resource-intensive from a human capital standpoint. Disparate devices can also lead to inefficiency in monitoring risks in high-volume and complex projects–this is true regardless of whether the project owners are leveraging these devices in construction, civil engineering, architecture and engineering, or mining and minerals.  

For far too long, this fragmented approach has caused project owners and leads to be forced to navigate traditional site monitoring methods like:

• Separate devices for vibration monitoring
• Additional units for tilt measurement
• Standalone sound monitoring equipment

These industries have long sought solutions that could simplify this process while maintaining environmental monitoring accuracy and reliability. Recent technological advances in seismology, particularly in smaller, digital MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) technology which offers advanced sensing capabilities along with reduced power consumption than traditional geophone-based arrays and electronics, have opened new possibilities for these industries by enabling more efficient, comprehensive and unified monitoring solutions.

Key Monitoring Devices Features Comparison for Project Specifications

In this guide we evaluate the monitoring capabilities of four leading monitoring devices, including the Inzwa VEVA III 3-in-1 device, Syscom Rock, Instantel Micromate, Svantek SV 803, and Omnidots Swarm. 

Notably in this guide, Inzwa’s VEVA III represents an industry-first: a significant leap forward in environmental monitoring technology, introducing the industry’s first true three-in-one monitoring solution. Unlike traditional systems that require separate devices for different measurements, this innovative device combines vibration, tilt, and sound monitoring in a single unit which aligns with recent IIoT industry trends that highlight demand around continuous sensing, real-time data and remote monitoring wherever an environmental project exists. 

Further, VEVA III is the only platform agnostic device, meaning when paired with Inzwa Cloud, project owners can send their sensor data from any third-party device or platform below to be analyzed in real-time. In other words, companies have the flexibility to bring their own platform instead of being forced to rely on a specific vendor’s platform, allowing greater customization across devices and control over their data and processes. 

Easy Reference Table

Understanding Technical Specifications

This feature comparison reveals significant operational differences across all five devices. While this comparison is meant to help you objectively compare features that are aligned with the latest IIoT industry trends, it’s also important to consider a unit’s ease of usability, pricing and value, operating costs, and customer support when selecting a monitoring device that aligns with your overall project objectives.

Here are four areas of comparison for project owners to consider when incorporating innovative approaches to ensure the integrity of their onsite needs.

1. Monitoring Integration

• VEVA III uniquely combines all three monitoring types (vibration, tilt, and sound) in one device which includes Class 1 sound level monitoring to ensure regulatory compliance documentation and reporting in addition to site safety. 
• Other traditional devices specialize in one or two monitoring types

Selecting a monitoring device with more integration built-in reduces equipment needs and also increases the long term value of the device since it can be used in different job site scenarios to meet measurement needs across various projects or opportunities to capture data in the field. A fully integrated device also simplifies deployment and data collection, which can be improved through remote monitoring solutions for automated visualization, reporting, and timely alerts.

2. Battery Performance

• VEVA III’s industry-leading integration of D-cell lithium batteries with up to  6-month battery life stands out significantly.
• Competitor devices can last as little as up to 15 days on average

Choosing a monitoring device with a longer battery life ensures uninterrupted monitoring, increases reliability and reduces maintenance visits and costs. Some competitor devices require devices to be connected to external batteries or solar units to extend the device uptime. Project owners also need to consider the number of events they anticipate being captured through the device per day as additional power units and frequent battery replacements can increase cost and can be challenging for remote sites.

3. Integrated Connectively Options

• VEVA III uses advanced 4G LTE and WiFi capabilities.
• Traditional solutions use various other connection methods.

Using a device with advanced connectivity ensures better network uptime and real-time accessibility and trustworthy data.

4. Technology Implementation

• Only Inzwa VEVA III and Omnidots Swarm leverage MEMS technology in their devices, while VEVA III also incorporates MEMS-based accelerometers in its microphone for noise monitoring given its 3-in-1 monitoring capability.
• While Omnidots Sawm uses MEMS-based sensors, it lacks the 3-in-1 device monitoring capabilities of Inzwa Cloud.

MEMS-based digital sensors are known for their accuracy and reliability in many different applications including vibration monitoring. By comparison, Geophone technology uses piezoelectric sensors with an integrated electronic interface that is suitable for particularly challenging or harsh industrial conditions, but not as compact and lightweight as MEMS technology.

While Geophone-based sensors might boast surface-level durability in rural or rugged environmentals, they are also larger, heavier, and consume more power than MEMS-based devices. They are also susceptible to damage from extreme temperatures, moister, dust, or mechanical shocks, and can be sensitive to electrical noise and interference which can impact performance. Over time, mechanical components like the coil and magnet can wear out or become misaligned which can impact measurement accuracy.

5. Event Recording

• Pre-trigger Recording: The ability of a recording system to capture data before the trigger event occurs, ensuring no important data is missed.
• Zero Dead-Time: This means that the recording system can capture data continuously without any gaps, ensuring no events are missed between recordings.

Pre-trigger recording is crucial for project owners so there is context that helps in analyzing the lead-up, source and cause, and sequence of events that happened just before a significant event was detected. By comparison, zero dead-time means no gaps or interruptions, but it could be difficult to determine the context of an event since it lacks the predictive ability of pre-trigger recordings.

6. Installation Ease

• Very Easy: For VEVA III’s 3-in-1 monitor or Omnidots Swarm, the devices can be setup in any direction and their orientation does not impact readings or cause damage to the devices. Installation also requires minimal effort and no special tools or setup, meaning it can be deployed and put to work within minutes. 
• Requires Setup: Installation involves some effort, including manual leveling or calibration, and may require specific tools or setup procedures. Plus, the devices can only be mounted vertically or horizontally, which can be challenging to achieve due to space constraints, plus leaves them susceptible to exposure to physical impact or dust and debris accumulation that could impact the accuracy of their sensor measurements. 

Another thing to consider is that geophone-based devices typically require manual leveling to ensure accurate measurements. Plus, if sound and tilt sensors are not integrated into the device, those traditional devices have components that need to be connected and configured separately which impacts overall ease of installation and maintenance. Other considerations include connectivity setup, adjustments due to environmental factors, software configuration for data collection, and power supply management. 

Looking to the Future of Devices for Continuous Remote Monitoring

The emergence of all-in-one monitoring solutions marks a significant shift in construction and engineering technology. As projects become more complex and regulatory requirements more stringent, integrated monitoring solutions will likely become the industry standard.

The integration of multiple monitoring capabilities into a single device offers significant cost benefits, including:

• Reduced hardware investment compared to purchasing separate devices
• Lower installation costs with single-point mounting
• Minimized training requirements for operators
• Simplified maintenance and calibration procedures
• Higher utilization of equipment across projects and over the long term.

For project managers and engineers looking to streamline their monitoring processes while enhancing data quality and compliance, integrated solutions offer a clear path forward. As the industry continues to evolve, the ability to monitor multiple parameters through a single, reliable device will become increasingly valuable for ensuring project success and safety.

This information is true and accurate to the best of our knowledge as publicly available during our research at the time of our writing this guide. If you recognize that any changes need to be made based on more recent information please email hello@inzwatech.com. 

1 Inzwa website: Inzwa.io
2 Syscom website: syscom.ch (https://www.syscom.ch/wp-content/uploads/Rock.pdf)
3 Instantel website: instantel.com
4 Svantek website: svantek.com (https://svantek.com/products/wireless-vibration-monitor-sv-803/)
5 Omnidots website: omnidots.com